Ask: Why does everything Microsoft create lately feel fragile and half-baked?

13 comments

• toast0 5 hours ago
  Microsoft changed its strategy around testing in 2014 [1], eliminating the Software Developer Engineer in Test position and having a goal of shipping faster.

  12 years later, most of their software is crap. Maybe it comes out faster?

  https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/08/how-m...

  [-]
  • dormento 3 hours ago
    That is correct. Those pesky testers kept finding bugs and sending modules back to rework, when they could have been letting the users find those bugs by themselves on the cheap. /s
• bob1029 23 hours ago
  Microsoft is a big place. I recommend focusing on the parts they do well rather than getting tribal. All of the following products and services are fantastic in 2026:

    Windows Server 
    SQL Server 
    .NET/C#/F#/Nuget
    Visual Studio [code]
    SSMS
    AAD/EntraID
    Defender
    DirectX
    Excel 
  

  I agree that Teams still kind of sucks and that Azure is a complete dumpster fire of a cloud, on average. But that doesn't mean we should throw the proverbial baby out with the bathwater. We should employ a multi-stage filtration system and extract whatever value we can.
• MisterTea 22 hours ago
  This always comes to mind: https://axelriet.medium.com/how-microsoft-vaporized-a-trilli...

  I just helped setup a new O365 account and joined Win 11 machines to Entra (Cloud Active directory) for a company.

  Total mess. The cloud services each had partial outages where I was met with "Data not available at this time" or various errors. At first I thought I was holding it wrong, but no, hours or even a day later things that didn't work suddenly worked. Going forward if I hit a wall I take a break, try again later and it works.

  I am no MS fan but the integration of Win11 and O365/Azure seems to be headed in the right direction but the execution is a total mess. One beef is OneDrive integration is an idiotic duality as its not a "drive" and given special treatment by office apps such as only allowing auto save when saving to Onedrive.

  MS, get your shit together.
• akagusu 9 hours ago
  Microsoft and others don't need quality to sell their crap.

  This is the benefit of being big enough to control a large chunk of the market.
• didriksg 21 hours ago
  Having worked with a client using Microsoft now, I feel ya. Logins are broken, exchange, admin, entra, everything feels so fragile.
• hulitu 9 hours ago
  > lately

  You must be new here.
• shpeedle 22 hours ago
  I personally find a lot of Microsoft software products to be a little buggy. Use Linux desktop for a while then use Windows and you'll see what I mean.

  C# is the best thing microsoft made, but was forced to be open sourced because of node.js.
• VirusNewbie 20 hours ago
  Microsoft pays significantly less than most other big tech companies. I'm not sure why they go this route, or if they think having a few super highly paid engineers to manage/lead the lower paid ones is the way to go, but it may be related.
• verdverm 23 hours ago
  I feel the same about Big G, with my leading hypothesis being that they are leaning into hands free Ai too much. I certainly have direct evidence for that from Google in the form of a slop deck they sent me, and perceived evidence through Google Cloud degradation.
• jdw64 22 hours ago
  Big companies always have internal conflicts and politics. Looking at Microsoft's products, you can see similar product lines competing with each other, and they're a mess. Personally, I think C# is a well-polished language, but the frameworks are terrible.

  Google is similar.

  All of Microsoft's recent products feel unstable and unfinished to me. Honestly, I think all big companies become bureaucratic and end up the same way. Google, in particular, had issues with the Antigravity IDE. And Gemini is also terrible.
• gokuljs 20 hours ago
  [dead]
• mooiedingen 23 hours ago
  [dead]
• frwrfwrfeefwf 13 hours ago
  indians